Monthly Archives: August 2009

Butch Cassidy and the Head-in-the-Sand Gang

The raucous free-for-alls playing across the country at various town hall meetings focusing on health care reform reminds me of one of my favorite movies, “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.”

No, this is not because Arlen Specter somehow reminds me of Paul Newman.

In the film, you might recall, Butch and Sundance make their fateful decision to go to Bolivia after they are pursued across much of the scenic Southwest by the unrelenting and implacable super posse dispatched by E.H. Harriman to stop their train-robbing ways.  The pair ride and ride, desperately trying to lose their dogged pursuers, but every time they look over their shoulders their unshakeable foes are still there, relentlessly hounding them.

 “Who are those guys?” Butch and Sundance repeatedly ask each other, with a mounting mixture of frustration and wonderment.

 That’s what I keep asking myself about the foaming, splenetic protesters who have turned out at various congressional events to vent their screeching, splenetic  opposition to Obama’s proposed health care reforms.  “Who are those guys?”

I mean, who in their right mind is satisfied with our current undeniably broken and unsatisfactory health care system, which leaves millions of Americans unprotected, and those of us who are lucky enough to have health insurance paying ever-escalating premiums for ever-diminishing coverage?  (Other than the insurance companies, of course, and those who carry water for them.) 

Granted, we’ve learned that these shout-fests, far from being spontaneous groundswells, are well-organized and orchestrated by various factions opposed to all aspects of Obama’s political agenda, such as the self-styled Tea-Party Patriots anti-government-spending zealots.  And some of the putative “just a mom from a few blocks away” have been revealed to be Republican operatives and party hacks. (Paul Krugman, as usual, has written one of his typically smart columns today, pointing out that even “moderate” Republicans like Chuck Grassley have embraced their party’s latest ridiculous lie, that Obama’s health-care proposals would establish “death panels” and advocate euthanasia of the elderly.)

Okay, if we’ve learned anything from the past eight years, it’s to expect a little—okay, make that a lot—of dissembling from the foes of social progress.  But what really concerns me is the ranting, raving, and rebuking rank-and-file.  Where did all of these desperate and angry and (let’s be honest) pale white people come from?

Are they so buffeted, depressed, or displaced by all of the soul-shaking events of the past decade—two recessions; terrorist attacks; two simultaneous, hard-to-comprehend wars in far-off, little-understood countries; an unprecedented financial crisis, all set off against a backdrop of growing economic inequality and uncertainty—that they have independently and collectively decided they are (in the memorable phrase uttered by Howard Beale in “Network”) “mad as hell and not going to take it any more.”  Even if the proposed reforms would probably make their own lives less stressful, more secure, and healthier?  (The irony, of course, is that for all their verbalized fears that Obama is a secret Socialist, in a truly social democratic society most of these people would find themselves with fewer economic insecurities.)  

Are they that fearful of change that they’re willing to fight—even threaten violence—to retain our current sick health care system?

Who are those guys?

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Opening the Midden Box

I spent many hours this past weekend delving, with the help of my Spousal Unit (SU), into a couple of big cardboard cartons filled with old family photos and documents that I inherited some years ago from my mother.

 When I say “old,” I mean “about a decade-older-than-ancient,” at least by contemporary standards.  On my mother’s-mother’s-mother’s side of my family (got that?) I am descended from German/Alsatian Jews who arrived in America a few decades before the Civil War and settled in Louisville, Kentucky, and later Nashville, Tennessee.  Thanks to a family tree compiled years ago by my first cousin, Anne Goldgar, (now a professor of history at the King’s College, London), I can trace part of my mother’s family back to my great-great-great-great-great grandfather, Abraham Lieberman, born in 1774 in Brishberg, Bavaria; died in Louisville in 1885.

And I can tell you with some confidence that, since well before that time, nobody on that side of  my family has ever thrown anything remotely significant away.  (Admittedly, this now seems like a good thing.)  Here are a few of the things we discovered in the midden boxes:

  • Many newspaper clippings, some dating back to 1930, reporting various family engagements, weddings, births, and deaths
  • A large photographic portrait of my grandmother (born 1896) as an infant
  • A photograph of my grandfather with his high school class, about 1910
  • Various formal portraits of my great-grandmother Corrinne (born 1866) and great-grandfather Charles (ditto)
  • Copy of a formal proclamation praising of the contribution to the local school board of my great-grandmother, who was a mover in Nashville civic circles until her death in 1928 (there was a high school there named after her)
  • Photographs of my great-great grandmother (born 1844)-and-father (born 1842), dating from shortly after the Civil War.
  • The ketuba or wedding contract from their wedding, dated October 14, 1863

Truthfully, reviewing this stuff, handling a 145-year old piece of paper covered with neat Hebrew printing, looking at faded but still-legible photographs labeled on the back in my grandmother’s wriggly handwriting, I felt an overwhelming sense of connection to my family.  I was very aware that all these things had been literally passed from hand-to-hand-to-hand-to-hand for generations, until they came into my own.

These irreplaceable artifacts are all printed on that most archaic and retrograde of media, paper.  And while many of the newspaper clippings are yellowed and a little flakey, most of the material is in surprisingly good condition.  The ketuba, despite being lettered by hand, was perfectly legible (good penmanship was something to be proud of in those days); it looked closer to 15 years old than 150.

I wonder if any of the digital record that we produce in the course of our daily lives today will be as legible and readily accessible to our descendants, say, 150 years hence?  Unlikely, me thinks.

In fact, my house is filled now with all sorts of electronic media and devices that I can’t even access anymore.  I have boxes of VHS tapes that I suppose we could still watch—if I still had the VCR hooked up.  The visual record of our trip to China to adopt our daughter back in 1996 resides on a proprietary Sanyo Camcorder cartridge that we have no way of watching since the camcorder itself kicked the bucket (shortly after its warranty expired, natch).

While CDs and DVDs were both claimed to be archival when they were first rolled out to consumers, anyone with a small child in the house knows that all it really takes to render them incomprehensible and useless is one good scratch.  (Another good reason to hang on to my vinyl copy of Saxophone Colossus.) The information stored on USB-flash drives is said to be good for years; we’ll see.

I can no longer even read the original digital versions of many things I produced myself.  For years I kept the floppy disks containing the manuscripts and notes for all of the magazine articles I wrote when I was just starting out, back in the early 80s.  I had boxes of old 5.25-inch and 3.5-inch floppies, filled with files written with WordStar (an early word-processing program that someone once aptly described as so user-unfriendly, “it was like waltzing with a refrigerator”.)

But every time I traded up my computer system—from CP/M to DOS to Windows 3.0 to Windows 95, etc., to the present Apple OS X 10.5—my technical capability to read the information on those disks receded further, just beyond my reach,  into the ungraspable past.  New hardware and software may be labelled “backwards compatible” for a few years, but inevitably the window is closed shut, and older formats and systems are eventually orphaned and abandoned—rendering their information all but irretrievable.  When was the last time you saw a computer with a built-in 5.25-inch floppy-disk drive? Probably while George H. W. Bush was still in the White House. 

Finally, I realized that with no computer that could read my old floppies, they were about as decipherable as Linear B and I tossed them all out.

Sic transit C:\>. Chalk up one advantage for dead trees.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized